Immigration Legal Professionals - What Are They Good For?

Immigration Legal Professionals - What Are They Good For?

When I checked my inbox this morning I discovered a vital electronic mail from a company of immigration lawyers in Atlanta can professionals which I belong to.

In reality, this email is so essential to my skill to follow immigration law that I forwarded it to all of my employees, saved it in our firm's digital address book, and printed it for inclusion within the binder that sits on my desk right by my telephone.

Yet, the truth is that this e mail makes me feel like I'm a silent companion in a bit of a deception being perpetrated on the general public by CIC. Let me explain.

Citizenship and Immigration Canada clearly takes nice public satisfaction within the quantity of data and resources it provides to the public through its website and call centre. CIC boasts that "All of the forms and information that it's essential apply for a visa are available at no cost on this website."

Therefore, it is no wonder that within the website's FAQ, the answer to the question: "Do I need an immigration representative to help me apply?" is a "no."

The general public is told that "The Authorities of Canada treats everyone equally, whether they use a consultant or not."

Will your case be processed more rapidly for those who hire a consultant? CIC advises that "If you select to hire a representative, your utility will not be given particular attention by the immigration officer."

Is this really true? Is all the information you want really on the market? Do you want a lawyer? Wouldn't it make any distinction if in case you have one? Put one other means: are people who are using lawyers and consultants to handle their immigration purposes just throwing away their money?

I hate answering these questions since doing other folks's immigration work is how I make my living. Folks could be justified in being sceptical about my solutions to those questions.

However the reality is "all the knowledge you want" isn't really on the market and, yes, in many cases a lawyer or advisor's involvement can spell the difference between success, delay, or abject failure.

The information at is common in nature and can't presumably contemplate the infinite factual scenarios that applicants may present when applying. Additionalmore, the brokers at the call centre can't and do not present callers with legal advice. It is simply not in their mandate to do so. Instead, they offer "general information on the CIC lines of business... present case particular info, and accept orders for CIC publications and utility kits."

In different words, they can not inform you what you 'ought to' do when confronted with obstacles or strategic choices to make.

Additionally, in the event you encounter a problem that needs to be escalated, which is not uncommon, you will see that valuable little information on the CIC website as to where to direct your complaint or question.

Not so with immigration professionals.

The e-mail I acquired this morning is an update of CIC's protocol on how immigration professionals should direct their queries. The correspondence incorporates the email address for every Canadian visa publish overseas and the names and e mail addresses of the immigration program managers at each of those offices. It tells us how, and to whom, to direct case-specific enquiries to the Case Management Department in Ottawa and when and how you can observe up if we don't receive a well timed reply. It offers directions on find out how to direct communications referring to quality of service complaints, situations involving possible misconduct or malfeasance of immigration officers, procedures, operational and selection policy, and processing times and levels.

To my information, this data just isn't shared with members of the public. CIC's failure to publicise this data does not reflect preferential therapy for many who are represented. Instead, it is simply an acknowledgement that immigration professionals do, and have all the time, performed a vital position in making an overburdened and underneath-resourced program perform at all (if not perform well).

Sharing this information with the general public would result in an avalanche of correspondence being directed at senior officers who are spread out so thinly that they may never get every other work done.

It's true that, except in distinctive and deserving cases, hiring a lawyer or guide can't get an software moved from the back of the road to the entrance of the line. Also, an officer is not going to approve an applicant who will not be certified just because he or she is represented. Nevertheless, additionally it is true that an sincere and skilled consultant won't clog up the system by submitting an utility that simply will not fly.

Our Hockey Network